Prediction of Leak Rates Through Porous Gaskets at High Temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability of a gasket to maintain tightness under different operating conditions has been studied extensively in recent years. However most of the research studies conducted on leakage predictions was performed at room temperature. The aim of this work is to predict leakage through gaskets take into account the effect of the temperature on the fluid properties changes and gasket internal structural characteristics. The analytical model of slip flow regime to evaluate the mass leak rates through a porous gasket developed in [1] was used in this study. The results from the model were validated and compared with experimental data obtained from tests conducted on the Universal Gasket Rig with two different gases (Helium, Nitrogen). The leak rates measured are in the range of 1 to 10−4 mg/s, which is measurable using a pressure rise technique. As a second objective the influence of the gasket displacements caused by stress and temperature on the flow leakage was studied. A relationship between displacement or void thickness and leakage is clearly demonstrated. The slip flow regime model is capable of predicting leakage at temperature with reasonable accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".