Did <i>Swift</i> measure gamma-ray burst prompt emission radii?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Swift X-Ray Telescope often observes a rapidly decaying X-ray emission stretching to as long as t ∼ 103 s after a conventional prompt phase. This component is most likely due to a prompt emission viewed at large observer angles θ &gt; 1/Γ, where θ ∼ 0.1 is a typical viewing angle of the jet and Γ ⩾ 100 is the Lorentz factor of the flow during the prompt phase. This can be used to estimate the prompt emission radii, rem ⩾ 2t c/θ2 ∼ 6 × 1015 cm. These radii are much larger than is assumed within the framework of a fireball model. Such large emission radii can be reconciled with a fast variability, on time-scales as short as milliseconds, if the emission is beamed in the bulk outflow frame, e.g. because of a random relativistic motion of ‘fundamental emitters’. This may also offer a possible explanation for X-ray flares observed during early afterglows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it