Fermentative Production of Pyranone Derivate I from Marine Vibrio sp. SKMARSP9: Isolation, Characterization and Bioactivity Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pyranone derivative I was isolated from fermented broth of isolated marine bacterial strain Vibrio sp. SKMARSP9. The compound I was characterized, and evaluated for its antimicrobial properties. The isolated strain was identified based on 16S rRNA based phylogenetic analysis. The molecular analysis data suggested that this strain is closely related to Vibrio ruber, Vibrio sp. MSSRF10 and Vibrio rhizosphaerae. The best fermentative growth of this isolate was achieved under halophilic conditions and grew efficiently at 30 °C in the presence of 12 % NaCl. The compound I production by this strain is associated with growth. The unpurified extract is hydrophobic in nature, and released only during late growth phase. The extract was purified and characterized by spectral data using NMR, DEPT, and ESI-MS. The purity of I was 97 % which was confirmed by HPLC. The pyranone derivative I exhibited >50 % antioxidant activity and broad spectrum antimicrobial properties against gram negative and gram positive strains. Molecular docking analysis revealed that this pyranone derivative I may be a potential candidate at pharmaceutical sector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".