Natural Convective Flow in a Three Enclosure System Involving Two High Aspect Ratio Side Enclosures Joined to a Large Square Enclosure With Interfacial Heat Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical study of free convective flow in a vertical joined three enclosure arrangement has been undertaken. In this arrangement, a vertical heated wall kept at a uniform high temperature is contained in a high aspect ratio rectangular side enclosure. This enclosure is joined to a second high aspect ratio rectangular side enclosure which has the same height as the first side enclosure, the two enclosures being separated by a vertical impermeable dividing wall which offers no resistance to heat transfer. The second side enclosure is joined to a larger square enclosure, the vertical dividing wall between these two enclosures also being impermeable and offering no resistance to heat transfer. The vertical wall of the square main flow enclosure opposite to the dividing wall is maintained at a uniform lower temperature. There is a uniform rate of heat generation in the dividing wall between the inner side enclosure and the main enclosure. The situation considered is an approximate model of a double-paned window exposed to a hot outside environment and covered by a plane blind which in turn is exposed to cooled room. In some such cases there can be significant heat generation in the blind due to the absorbtion of solar energy, this being modeled by the heat generation in the one dividing wall. The flow has been assumed to be laminar and two-dimensional and results have been obtained for a Prandtl number of 0.7. The effects of Rayleigh number, dimensionless width of the side enclosures and dimensionless heat generation rate in the blind on the Nusselt number have been investigated. The results show that for a fixed Rayleigh number and for a given dimensionless first (i.e., outer) side enclosure width, there is a minimum in the Nusselt number variation with the dimensionless width of the second side enclosure. An approximate solution for the Nusselt number variation with the dimensionless width of the second side enclosure for small values of this dimensionless width has also been derived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".