MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069625614 · doi:10.7202/1006702ar

Les Églises protestantes et l’assistance aux pauvres à Montréal au XIXe siècle

2011· article· fr· W2069625614 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Janice Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Dawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le système d’assistance aux pauvres développé à Montréal au XIXe siècle était organisé sur une base privée et confessionnelle avec des réseaux d’aide distincts pour les catholiques et les protestants. Cet article décrit le rôle des Églises dans le réseau charitable protestant. En général, ces Églises assuraient une assistance de base aux membres de leur confession. Vers la fin du siècle elles ont augmenté leurs interventions en développant des services pour les nouveaux immigrants et en construisant les missions, inspirées d’une approche sociale face à la pauvreté. Pourtant les Églises protestantes n’ont pas ouvert d’orphelinats, de refuges ou de dépôts pour les pauvres comme le faisaient les congrégations religieuses catholiques. Le réseau protestant d’institutions charitables a en effet été développé par l’élite, non pas par les Églises. Toutefois ces groupes de bénévoles étaient fortement influencés par la religion et ont maintenu des liens étroits avec le clergé protestant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207