Properties of <i>Xenopus</i> Kv1.10 channels expressed in HEK293 cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Voltage-gated K+ channels play important roles in shaping the characteristics of action potentials and electrical activity. In a previous study, we isolated cDNAs encoding several distinct K+ channel isoforms, including a novel isoform (XKv1.10) expressed in Xenopus laevis spinal cord neurons and myocytes. Here, we report the biophysical characterization of XKv1.10 expressed in transiently transfected HEK293 cells. Whole cell patch clamp recordings revealed a voltage-gated, rapidly activating and inactivating K+ current. Interestingly, the rate of inactivation of XKv1.10 channels showed apparent voltage dependence, with time constants between 77.7-213.3 ms. The predicted protein sequence of XKv1.10 does not appear to encode an N-terminal inactivating "ball and chain" domain, and instead these channels may inactivate via a C/P-type mechanism. Consistent with this, either increasing the external concentration of K+ or external application of tetraethylammonium caused a decrease in the rate of inactivation. Pharmacologically, XKv1.10 K+ channels were sensitive to 4-aminopyridine and tetraethylammonium with apparent IC50 values of 68.5 microM and 17.1 mM, respectively. When simulated action potentials were used as a voltage command, XKv1.10 was similar to XKv1.4 in that it carried more repolarizing current during the action potential than XKv1.2. However, while XKv1.4 was active during the interspike interval, XKv1.10 and XKv1.2 were not. Overall, the data suggest that XKv1.10 channels make a unique contribution to the developmental maturation of electrical signaling in Xenopus laevis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".