MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069658430 · doi:10.1021/jp992540s

Solvation of the Hydroxide Anion:  A Combined DFT and Molecular Dynamics Study

2000· article· en· W2069658430 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Wei, Emil Proynov, Anne Milet, Dennis R. Salahub

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolvationProtonDensity functional theoryMolecular dynamicsChemistryHydrogen bondImplicit solvationComputational chemistryHydroxideIonChemical physicsPhysical chemistryMoleculePhysicsInorganic chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of solvated hydroxide complexes ((OH) - H 2 O) n, n = 1−3, is studied in detail using density functional theory (DFT), MP2, and Born−Oppenheimer-Molecular Dynamics (BOMD) approaches. Several nonlocal functionals of the GGA and LAP families are employed, special attention is paid to the reliability of the LAP functionals in predicting structure, energetics, and proton transfer barriers. It is found that most of these give reasonable energetics of the quite strong hydrogen bonding in hydroxide anions (within a difference of about 2−15% from the experimental solvation enthalpies), provided that basis sets with both polarization and diffuse functions are employed and the basis set superposition error is taken care of. The performance of the various methods for the geometry of the hydroxide complexes is not so uniform, especially for the hydrogen bond distances and the shape of the complex with three water ligands. These differences are reflected also in the calculated vibrational spectra, particularly concerning the vibrations involving the hydrogen bonds. For O 2 H 3 -, the potential energy surface associated with the central proton degrees of freedom is very flat, which leads to an intriguing proton dynamics. The BOMD simulation shows that the proton population profile is rather similar for BP and PP functionals, while the dynamical proton-transfer counting autocorrelation function, is, on the other hand, very sensitive to the choice of functional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207