Host Immune Response to<i>Salmonella enterica</i>Serovar Typhimurium Infection in Mice Derived from Wild Strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies of mouse models of endotoxemia and sepsis with gram-negative bacteria have shown that the host response is genetically controlled. Mice infected with the gram-negative bacterium Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium exhibit marked genetic differences in disease manifestation, and the wild-derived strain Mus musculus molossinus MOLF/Ei is extremely susceptible to S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. The kinetics of bacterial proliferation within the liver and the spleen and histological examination of tissue sections have suggested that MOLF/Ei mice do not succumb to infection because of overwhelming bacterial growth in the reticuloendothelial organs or massive tissue necrosis, as observed in other Salmonella-susceptible strains. MOLF/Ei mice respond normally to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vivo and in vitro, as determined by the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha and spleen cell mitogenesis. However, they have a unique cytokine profile in response to infection compared to that observed for other Salmonella-susceptible mice. There was increased expression of mRNA of the interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha) and IL-1 beta genes as the infection in the spleens and livers of MOLF/Ei mice progressed. Despite the fact that MOLF/Ei mice have the ability to respond to LPS and the fact that there are significant increases in IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta mRNA, Nos2 in the spleen is not upregulated and nitrite production by spleen cells is reduced. At the central level, the inflammatory response is characterized by strong upregulation of the inhibitory factor kappa B alpha and Toll-like receptor 2 genes, two genes known to be regulated by LPS and IL-1 in the brain. The high levels of IL-1 expression in the spleens and livers of MOLF/Ei mice may have important implications for the activation of peripheral and central innate immune mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".