MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069699488 · doi:10.1159/000327280

Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma

2001· article· en· W2069699488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Cytologica · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberous Sclerosis Complex Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngiomyolipomaEpithelioid cellMedicinePathologyBiopsyFine-needle aspirationHMB-45Renal cell carcinomaDifferential diagnosisClear cellGiant cellKidneyImmunohistochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Epithelioid angiomyolipoma (AMYL) is a variant of angiomyolipoma characterized by sheets of epithelioid cells that may mimic renal cell carcinoma. This is the first report describing the fine needle aspiration biopsy features of this lesion. CASE: A 47-year-old man with a history of epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney treated with nephrectomy nine months previously presented with a recurrent retroperitoneal mass and multiple nodular liver lesions. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of one of the liver lesions showed fragments and sheets of noncohesive epithelioid cells with thin cytoplasm, markedly atypical nuclei, and scattered bizarre and multinucleated forms. The epithelioid cells focally expressed HMB-45 and were nonimmunoreactive, with epithelial markers. CONCLUSION: Epithelioid AMYL may pose differential diagnostic problems with high grade carcinoma, especially renal cell, hepatocellular and metastatic carcinoma. An awareness of this entity and its characteristic cytologic features and immunoreactivity with HMB-45 is helpful in its identification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it