MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2069712827 · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2428

Doctors should be able to help terminally patients to die, say Quebec MPs

2012· article· en· W2069712827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Owen Dyer

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConscienceTerminally illDeath with dignityAssisted suicideDignityJurisdictionRight to diePhysician assisted suicideLawCommissionChoseLegislatureLiving WillsPolitical scienceMedicineNursingPalliative care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian province of Quebec should change its laws to allow physician assisted dying in certain cases of incurable disease and stop prosecuting doctors who, in good conscience, help such patients to die, according to a cross party report from the provincial legislature. If enacted, as seems likely, the changes would make Quebec the fourth and largest jurisdiction in North America to permit physician assisted death in tightly controlled circumstances, after the western states of Washington, Oregon, and Montana. The Quebec report, Dying with Dignity , is careful to avoid the terms physician assisted suicide or euthanasia, preferring the phrase “medical aid to die.” “We chose those words because we’re talking about a medical environment only,” said commission …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0100.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ→Same topicHealth, Medicine and Society→French-language works237,207→