MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069742684 · doi:10.1081/agb-100105036

IDENTITIES FOR ALGEBRAS OBTAINED FROM THE CAYLEY-DICKSON PROCESS

2001· article· en· W2069742684 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Algebra · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIowa State University
KeywordsMathematicsMultilinear mapNoncommutative geometryQuadratic algebraIdentity (music)Non-associative algebraPure mathematicsDegree (music)Dimension (graph theory)Division algebraJordan algebraSet (abstract data type)Algebra over a fieldQuadratic equationAlgebra representationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cayley-Dickson process gives a recursive method of constructing a nonassociative algebra of dimension 2 n for all n ≥ 0, beginning with any ring of scalars. The algebras in this sequence are known to be flexible quadratic algebras; it follows that they are noncommutative Jordan algebras: they satisfy the flexible identity in degree 3 and the Jordan identity in degree 4. For the integral sedenion algebra (the double of the octonions) we determine a complete set of generators for the multilinear identities in degrees ≤ 5. Since these identities are satisfied by all flexible quadratic algebras, it follows that a multilinear identity of degree ≤ 5 is satisfied by all the algebras obtained from the Cayley-Dickson process if and only if it is satisfied by the sedenions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it