MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069750071 · doi:10.1115/pvp2014-28218

Effect of Aspect Ratio on the Flow Field Above the Free End of a Finite Circular Cylinder

2014· article· en· W2069750071 on OpenAlexaff
Noorallah Rostamy, David S. Sumner, Donald J. Bergstrom, J. D. Bugg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCylinderFree surfaceVortexWind tunnelGeometryParticle image velocimetryMechanicsReynolds numberPlane symmetryBoundary layerPhysicsOpticsFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceTurbulenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow above the free end of a surface-mounted finite-height circular cylinder was studied in a low-speed wind tunnel using particle image velocimetry (PIV). The cylinder was mounted vertically in the wind tunnel, normal to a ground plane. The approaching flow was in the x-direction and the cylinder axis was aligned in the z-direction. Velocity measurements were made above the free-end surface in several vertical (x-z) planes and several horizontal (x-y) planes, for finite circular cylinders of aspect ratios AR = 9, 7, 5 and 3, at a Reynolds number of Re = 4.2×104. The relative thickness of the boundary layer on the ground plane was δ/D = 1.7. In the vertical symmetry plane, the mean velocity measurements show the prominent separation from the circumferential leading edge, the mean recirculation zone above the free-end surface, the arch vortex inside the recirculation zone, and reattachment of the flow onto the free-end surface. Experimental evidence is found for a leading-edge separation bubble, a flow structure which has been reported in some numerical simulations in the literature. As AR decreases, the reattachment point and the centre of the arch vortex move downstream, the recirculation zone becomes thicker, and the centre of the arch vortex moves higher above the free end. Away from the symmetry plane, the recirculation zone becomes thinner, the arch vortex centre moves upstream and closer to the free-end surface, and the reattachment point moves upstream. In the horizontal planes, measurements made very close to the surface can approximate the mean surface streamline topology, revealing the pair of foci representing the termination points of the arch vortex, the prominent curved reattachment line, reverse flow beneath the mean recirculation zone, and the reattachment and separation saddle points on the free-end centerline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207