Osteogenesis With Hematopoiesis Simulating Infection in a Hydroxyapatite Orbital Implant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 28-year-old woman underwent secondary orbital implant surgery with placement of a hydroxyapatite implant. Over the next 7 years she underwent 3 drilling procedures. She began having copious discharge 1 year after the last drilling procedure. She was seen on numerous occasions with socket discharge, unresponsive to a variety of topical and oral antibiotics. Clinically, with the conjunctiva diffusely inflamed, the implant tender to touch, and the presence of a pyogenic granuloma, implant infection was suspected and the implant subsequently removed. Histopathologic assessment revealed widespread lamellar bone formation, including focal areas of marrow with active extramedullary hematopoiesis. There was no evidence of an inflammatory process or infection. Postoperatively the patient's symptoms and signs resolved. Extramedullary hematopoiesis within hydroxyapatite implants is rare. Porous orbital implant infection is also rare. Osteogenesis with extramedullary hematopoiesis simulating implant infection has not previously been reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".