Fibroblast extracellular matrix gene expression in response to keratinocyte‐releasable stratifin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Termination of wound-healing process requires a fine balance between connective tissue deposition and its hydrolysis. Previously, we have demonstrated that keratinocyte-releasable stratifin, also known as 14-3-3 sigma protein, stimulates collagenase (MMP-1) expression in dermal fibroblasts. However, role of extracellular stratifin in regulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) factors and other matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in dermal fibroblast remains unexplored. To address this question, large-scale ECM gene expression profile were analyzed in human dermal fibroblasts co-cultured with keratinocytes or treated with recombinant stratifin. Superarray pathway-specific microarrays were utilized to identify upregulation or downregulation of 96 human ECM and adhesion molecule genes. RT-PCR and Western blot were used to validate microarray expression profiles of selected genes. Comparison of gene profiles with the appropriate controls showed a significant (more than twofold) increase in expression of collagenase-1, stromelysin-1 and -2, neutrophil collagenase, and membrane type 5 MMP in dermal fibroblasts treated with stratifin or co-cultured with keratinocytes. Expression of type I collagen and fibronectin genes decreased in the same fibroblasts. The results of a dose-response experiment showed that stratifin stimulates the expression of stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) mRNA by dermal fibroblasts in a concentration-dependent fashion. Furthermore, Western blot analysis of fibroblast-conditioned medium showed a peak in MMP-3 protein levels 48 h following treatment with recombinant stratifin. In a lasting-effect study, MMP-3 protein was detected in fibroblast-condition medium for up to 72 h post removal of stratifin. In conclusion, our results suggest that keratinocyte-releasable stratifin plays a major role in induction of ECM degradation by dermal fibroblasts through stimulation of key MMPs, such as MMP-1 and MMP-3. Therefore, stratifin protein may prove to be a useful target for clinical intervention in controlling excessive wound healing in fibrotic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".