MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069789842 · doi:10.1063/1.4799278

Tilted epitaxy on (211)-oriented substrates

2013· article· en· W2069789842 on OpenAlex
Steffi Y. Woo, Gabriel A. Devenyi, Shahram Ghanad-Tavakoli, R. N. Kleiman, J. S. Prestón, Gianluigi A. Botton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitaxyTransmission electron microscopyMaterials scienceLattice (music)Condensed matter physicsDiffractionCrystallographySemiconductorElectron diffractionOptoelectronicsOpticsNanotechnologyChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spontaneous tilting of lattice mismatched epilayers grown on (211)-oriented substrates has been observed in numerous systems in literature. Here, we have examined a model system, GaSb/Si(211), with two dimensional X-ray diffraction and conventional transmission electron microscopy, and developed a universal model which explains the origin of the tilt phenomenon as the minimization of projected lattice mismatch for low-index planes across the film/substrate interface. The model developed predicts the tilt for lattice mismatches in the range of 0%–20% covering most semiconductor heteroepitaxial systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it