Creeping Flow Through Microchannels With Integrated Micro-Pillars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pressure drop through micro-pillar-integrated mini/microchannels is studied experimentally and analytically. Following our previous studies, the low aspect ratio micropillars embedded in a microchannel are modeled as a porous medium sandwiched between channel walls. The pressure drop is expressed as a function of the salient geometrical parameters such as channel dimension, diameter and spacing between the adjacent cylinders as well as their arrangement. To verify the developed model, several silicon/glass samples with and without integrated pillars are fabricated using the deep reacting ion etching (DRIE) technique. Pressure drop measurements are performed over a range of water flow rates ranging from 0.1 ml/min to 0.5 ml/min. The proposed model is successfully verified with the present experimental data. A parametric study is performed by employing the proposed model, which shows that the flow resistance has a reverse relationship with the micro-pillar diameter and the mini/microchannel porosity. In addition, staggered arrangements have a significantly lower flow resistance than squared arrays of pillars especially in dense structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".