MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069820542 · doi:10.7202/1025130ar

Portrait des programmes québécois d’aide aux conjoints ayant des comportements violents

2014· article· fr· W2069820542 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Normand Brodeur, Élisabeth Lesieux, Maryse Rinfret-Raynor, Joannie Pépin-Gagné

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trente-trois organismes communautaires québécois ont un programme d’aide aux conjoints ayant des comportements violents envers leur partenaire. L’objectif de l’étude présentée dans cet article était de dresser un portrait de leurs services et d’examiner les effets du financement qui leur a été octroyé par le gouvernement du Québec dans le cadre de son deuxième plan d’action en matière de violence conjugale (2004-2009). Vingt-sept organismes ont complété un sondage réalisé à la fin de l’année 2008. Les résultats sont analysés à la lumière d’études similaires réalisées aux États-Unis et en Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207