MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069875065 · doi:10.1139/p01-101

Spin-liquid phase in the pyrochlore anti-ferromagnet

2001· article· en· W2069875065 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
B. Canals, D. A. Garanin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPyrochloreBrillouin zoneCondensed matter physicsFerromagnetismSpin (aerodynamics)Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Quantum mechanicsPhase (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correlation functions (CFs) of the classical Heisenberg anti-ferromagnet on the pyrochlore lattice are studied by solving exactly the infinite-component spin-vector model. As in many fully frustrated lattices, the constraint due to the minimization of the energy and the particular structure based on corner-sharing tetrahedra both contribute to the creation of local degrees of freedom. The resulting degeneracy destroys any magnetic order at all temperatures and we obtain no sign of criticality, even at T = 0. Calculated neutron-scattering cross sections have their maxima beyond the first Brillouin zone and reproduce experimental results obtained on Y(Sc)Mn 2 and CsCrNiF 6 as well as theoretical predictions previously obtained by classical Monte Carlo simulations. Evidences for thermal and spatial decoupling of the magnetic modes are found so that the magnetic fluctuations in this system can be approximated by S(q,T) [Formula: see text] f(q) h(T). PACS Nos.: 75.10Hk, 75.50Ee, 75.40Cx, 75.40-s

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207