Probing the binding sites of resveratrol, genistein, and curcumin with milk<i>β</i>-lactoglobulin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We determined the binding sites of curcumin (cur), resveratrol (res), and genistein (gen) with milk β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) at physiological conditions. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, circular dichroism, and fluorescence spectroscopic methods as well as molecular modeling were used to determine the binding of polyphenol-protein complexes. Structural analysis showed that polyphenols bind β-LG via both hydrophilic and hydrophobic contacts with overall binding constants of Kcurcumin-β-LG = 4.4 (± .4) × 10⁴ M⁻¹, Kresveratrol-β-LG = 4.2 (± .2) × 10⁴ M⁻¹, and Kgenistein-β-LG = 1.2 (± .2) × 10⁴ M⁻¹. The number of polyphenol molecules bound per protein (n) was 1 (cur), 1.1 (res), and 1 (gen). Molecular modeling showed the participation of several amino acid residues in polyphenol-protein complexation with the free binding energy of -12.67 (curcumin-β-LG), -12.60 (resveratrol-β-LG), and -10.68 kcal/mol (genistein-β-LG). The order of binding was cur > res > gen. Alteration of the protein conformation was observed in the presence of polyphenol with a major reduction of β-sheet and an increase in turn structure, causing a partial protein structural destabilization. β-LG might act as a carrier to transport polyphenol in vitro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it