Development of Images-Symbols in the Russian Language (Linguoculturological Aspect)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to linguistic images-symbols as national-specific elements of the Russian languagereflecting the peculiar character of the national (Russian) culture, special aspects of national way of thinking andinterpretation of the surrounding world. The dependence of images-symbols evolving in the Russian language onthe specifics of each historical period in the development of Russian language cultural community is exposed onthe grounds of the study being undertaken. It has been established that functioning of images-symbols with theemotive-estimating nature having imaginative-symbolic sense appeared to be the consequence of religioussymbolism deprivation in syntagmatic combinations of the ancient syncretism epoch as a result of decompositionin syncretic thinking of a man within the Epichristian period, of change in socio-cultural situation in AncientRussia, i.e. the rejection of the Church Slavonic nature of language and the implantation of laic principle into thecommunity of medieval-era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it