Active Cabin Noise and Vibration Control for Turboprop Aircraft Using Multiple Piezoelectric Actuators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Active Structural Acoustic Control (ASAC) technique was applied to reduce propeller-induced noise and vibration in the passenger cabin of the deHavilland Dash-8 turboprop aircraft. Piezoceramic elements were used for structural actuation while velocity feedback of the fuselage was achieved through the use of accelerometers. Three actuators comprised of segmented piezoelectric elements were designed with the objective of reducing the noise and vibration levels at the propeller Blade Passage Frequency (BPF). Twelve accelerometers were grouped to effectively form three sensors. Second order classical compensators were designed for each of the three dominant control loops in order to achieve high gain at the BPF, rendering the closed-loop system insensitive to disturbances at the control frequency. The propeller acoustic field on the port side of the aircraft was simulated in a laboratory using a speaker-ring consisting of four loudspeakers. The control system was tested using this acoustic field, producing noise attenuation as high as 28 dB in the interior, and fuselage vibration reduction as high as 16 dB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it