MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069944760 · doi:10.1002/star.200700617

Influence of Citric Acid on the Properties of Glycerol‐plasticized dry Starch (DTPS) and DTPS/Poly(lactic acid) Blends

2007· article· en· W2069944760 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Wang, Jiugao Yu, Peter R. Chang, Xiaofei Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueStarch - Stärke · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLactic acidFourier transform infrared spectroscopyThermal stabilityCitric acidStarchComposite materialThermoplasticRheologyExtrusionChemical engineeringChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the presence of citric acid (CA), one‐step extrusion processing is used to prepare poly(lactic acid)/thermoplastic dry starch (PLA/DTPS) blends (50/50, %, w/w) in a single‐screw extruder. The rheological study proves that CA decreases the viscosity of both DTPS and of DTPS/PLA blends. The low viscosity increases the dispersion and decreases the interfacial tension between DTPS and PLA, as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In the presence of CA, the tensile strength of DTPS/PLA reaches 41 MPa—similar to that of pure PLA—because of improved dispersion and compatibility. At the same time, CA increases not only the degradation of starch, but also the interaction between DTPS and PLA, as detected by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The blend containing CA has a higher thermal stability. The water absorption of DTPS and DTPS/PLA blends is also studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStarch - StärkeSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207