Intramedullary Fibular Graft for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intramedullary fibular graft was used in four patients for tibiotalocalcaneal fusion. There were three men and one woman. The average age was 49.7 years (range, 35-73 years). The initial injuries were three pilon fractures and one ankle fracture. Tibiotalocalneal arthrodesis was performed as a salvage procedure for patients with significant posttraumatic arthritis of the ankle, concomitant subtalar arthritis, and severe osteopenia. The average followup was 28 months (range, 24-31 months). All the patients had successful arthrodesis and were satisfied with the outcome results. The average preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score for the whole group was 49.5 (range, 44-54) and improved postoperatively to 78.5 (range, 71-81). Three patients had a good score and one patient had a fair score. There was no postoperative infection or fracture of the graft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".