MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069957417 · doi:10.1080/02786820903518899

Comparison of Polycarbonate and Polytetrafluoroethylene Filters for Sampling of Airborne Bacteriophages

2010· article· en· W2069957417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAerosol Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolizationPolytetrafluoroethyleneInfectivityPolycarbonateColiphageMicrobiologyBacteriophageChemistryPolymerase chain reactionMolecular biologyChromatographyVirologyBiologyVirusBiochemistryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aerosolized coliphage phiX174 and lactococcal phage P008 were sampled with two types of filter, polycarbonate (PC) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). The recovery was determined by plaque assays and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Recovery by qPCR was greater than by culture and PC filters outperformed PTFE filters both by culture and by qPCR relative recovery. The results of the plaque assays showed that the infectivity of the recovered phages was affected by the aerosolization/air sampling. The presence of viruses in air samples should be determined by culture-independent assays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it