MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069977939 · doi:10.2307/3092448

Historical Roots of the Urban Crisis: African Americans in the Industrial City, 1900-1950

2002· article· en· W2069977939 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Ferguson, Henry Louis Taylor, Walter Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American History · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsIdeologyRace (biology)Political economyInequalityEconomic historyWork (physics)SociologyHistoryPolitical scienceGender studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1996, Thomas Sugrue's pathbreaking The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit wrested the story of innercity devastation from present-minded social scientists and journalists to reveal the complex historical roots of the crisis. Now Henry Louis Taylor Jr. and Walter Hill's edited collection, Historical Roots of the Urban Crisis, has pushed the story back even further, to the origins of African American communities in America's industrializing cities. While the editors do not explicitly acknowledge Sugrue's approach, their volume is clearly inspired by his. Bringing together essays by junior and senior scholars that address the political, economic, and social roots of the urban crisis—from the broad reach of dominant national ideologies, economic structures, and federal labor policy to the impact of community formation and the internal politics of individual black communities on the shape of black activism, work, and residential patterns—it seeks the same depth and breadth as Sugrue's work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0210.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American HistorySame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207