MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Formation of Deformation-Induced Divorced Eutectoid Pearlite above the Ae<sub>1</sub>

2011· article· en· W2069997817 on OpenAlexafffund
Vladimir V. Basabe, John J. Jonas, Chiradeep Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPearliteCementiteEutectic systemMaterials scienceAusteniteFerrite (magnet)Isothermal transformation diagramIsothermal processMetallurgyAtmospheric temperature rangeComposite materialThermodynamicsMicrostructureBainitePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 0.21% C plain carbon steel was deformed in torsion to strains of ε = 0.15-3.0 at a strain rate of ε ̇= 4.5 s-1 over the temperature range 722-822°C in a 5%H2-Ar gas atmosphere. The experimental parameters were varied in order to study the formation of ferrite and pearlite by dynamic transformation (DT) in the intercritical region. This transformation was observed right up to the highest experimental temperature (822°C). The pearlite formed by DT contained cementite spheroids whose size distribution evolved during isothermal holding after deformation. In the first stage, corresponding to the first 800 s of holding, spheroid coarsening took place. When the holding time exceeded 800 s, the spheroids dissolved and the pearlite reverted into the original parent austenite. The results indicate that pearlite can form by DT at temperatures well above the Ae1 and that the reverse static transformation is much slower than the forward dynamic transformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207