MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070024159 · doi:10.7202/1024516ar

Chronique sur le métier de chercheur

2013· article· fr· W2070024159 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Charlotte Cloutier, Ann Langley

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entreprise · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En examinant les articles parus dans les revues scientifiques au cours des dernieres annees, on constate que la majorite d’entre eux ont ete ecrits par des chercheurs collaborant ensemble. L’article ecrit par un auteur unique est de plus en plus rare et celui comportant de nombreux coauteurs est en voie de devenir la norme. Par exemple, lors de la conference EGOS qui s’est tenue a Montreal en juillet 2013, un nombre etonnant des textes soumis comportaient quatre auteurs ou plus, quelque chose qui aurait ete exceptionnel il y a dix ans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0140.011
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale P M E Économie et gestion de la petite et moyenne entrepriseSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207