MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070034250 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2012.2208968

Active Model-Based Predictive Control and Experimental Investigation on Unmanned Helicopters in Full Flight Envelope

2012· article· en· W2070034250 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Flight envelopeAerodynamicsEnvelope (radar)Model predictive controlNoise (video)EngineeringErrors-in-variables modelsFilter (signal processing)Process (computing)Control engineeringComputer scienceAerospace engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the control of unmanned helicopters in full flight envelope, an active model based predictive control scheme is developed in this brief. Dynamics in full envelope is modeled, with uncertainties represented by the system model error and process noise. The model error depends on both helicopter dynamics and flight mode, and the process noise is assumed unknown but bounded. Based on the set-membership filter, an active modeling based stationary increment predictive control, based on the estimated model error and its boundary to optimally compensate the model error, as well as the aerodynamics time delay, is proposed. The proposed method has been implemented on the ServoHeli-40 unmanned helicopter platform and experimentally tested; the results have demonstrated its effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it