NEPHELINE: STRUCTURE OF THREE SAMPLES FROM THE BANCROFT AREA, ONTARIO, OBTAINED USING SYNCHROTRON HIGH-RESOLUTION POWDER X-RAY DIFFRACTION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structure of three samples of nepheline (ideally, K{sub 2}Na{sub 6}[Al{sub 8}Si{sub 8}O{sub 32}]) from the Bancroft area of Ontario (1a, b: Egan Chute, 2: Nephton, and 3: Davis Hill), each with different types of superstructure reflections, has been studied using synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD) data and Rietveld structure refinement. The samples have different origins. The structure was refined in space group P6{sub 3}. The R{sub F}{sup 2} index, number of unique observed reflections, pseudohexagonal subcell parameters, and site-occupancy factor (sof) for the K site are as follows: Sample 1b: R{sub F}{sup 2} = 0.0433, N{sub obs} = 1399, a = 9.99567(1), c = 8.37777(1) {angstrom}, V = 724.907(2) {angstrom}{sub 3}, and K (sof) = 0.716(1). Sample 2: R{sub F}{sup 2} = 0.0669, N{sub obs} = 1589, a = 10.00215(1), c = 8.38742(1) {angstrom}, V = 726.684(1) {angstrom}{sub 3}, and K (sof) = 0.920(1). Sample 3: R{sub F}{sup 2} = 0.0804, N{sub obs} = 1615, a = 9.99567(1), c = 8.37873(1) {angstrom}, V = 724.991(1) {angstrom}{sub 3}, and K (sof) = 0.778(2). Sample 2 has the largest sof for K and the largest volume. The satellite reflections in the three nepheline samples were observed in the HRPXRDmore » traces and give rise to different incommensurate superstructures. The Al and Si atoms in the T{sub 3} and T{sub 4} sites are ordered differently in the three samples, which may indicate the presence of a domain structure based on Al-Si order. The positions for the Al and Si atoms were interchanged in two samples because of the resulting distances. The slight excess of Si over Al atoms, characteristically encountered in well-analyzed samples of nepheline, is reflected in the distances.« less
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it