Defective excitation‐contraction coupling in hearts of rats with congestive heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: We examined the cellular basis for depressed cardiac contractility in rats with congestive heart failure (CHF) secondary to myocardial infarction. METHODS: Six weeks after ligation of the left coronary artery, CHF was confirmed by haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic demonstration of reduced myocardial contractility in vivo. Papillary muscles from CHF animals developed less force than those from sham operated (SHAM) animals. Cell shortening was measured in isolated ventricular myocytes voltage-clamped with high resistance electrodes. Ca2+ transients were measured in fluo-4 loaded myocytes. RESULTS: Contractions triggered by depolarizing test steps from a post conditioning potential of -70 mV were significantly smaller and had significantly reduced velocity of shortening in CHF compared with SHAM myocytes. However, contractions initiated from -40 mV, were similar in amplitude and velocity of shortening in CHF and SHAM cells. L-type Ca2+ current was not significantly different between CHF and SHAM cells, whether activated from -70 or -40 mV. Therefore, in SHAM cells, excitation-contraction coupling exhibited higher gain when contractions were initiated from negative (-70 mV), as compared with depolarized potentials (-40 mV). However, in CHF myocytes, excitation-contraction coupling gain was selectively depressed with steps from -70 mV. This depression of gain in CHF was not accompanied by a significant reduction in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content. Isoproterenol increased Ca2+ transients less in CHF than SHAM myocytes. CONCLUSION: In this post-infarction model of CHF, the contractile deficit was voltage dependent and the gain of excitation-contraction coupling was selectively depressed for contractions initiated negative to -40 mV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".