MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070064055 · doi:10.2217/imt.09.80

Immunization of Newborn and Adult Mice with Low Numbers of BCG Leads to Th1 Responses, Th1 Imprints and Enhanced Protection Upon BCG Challenge

2009· article· en· W2070064055 on OpenAlexafffund
Tadele G. Kiros, Carl A. Power, Guojian Wei, Peter A. Bretscher

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunotherapy · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsVaccinationMedicineImmunizationImmunologyImmune systemContext (archaeology)TuberculosisImmunityBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination is widely employed to protect against tuberculosis. Predominant Th1 but not mixed Th1/Th2 responses are thought to be protective. If so, effective vaccination must cause Th1 imprints. The immune system of infants differs from that of adults and such differences could critically affect neonatal vaccination. We demonstrate that BCG infection of infant and adult mice produces similar responses. Infection with low and high numbers of BCG, respectively, leads to sustained Th1 and mixed Th1/Th2 responses. Low-dose but not high-dose infection also results in Th1 imprints, guaranteeing a Th1 response upon high-dose challenge, and resulting in optimal bacterial clearance. Our observations on low-dose Th1 imprinting are intriguing in the context of the well-known madras trial. In this trial, the highest dose of BCG, which had insignificant side effects, was administered to over 250,000 human subjects. This high-dose vaccination resulted in insignificant protection against tuberculosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunotherapySame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207