Fever and lethargy induced by subcutaneous pyrogen infusion in unrestrained rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have investigated the effects of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), muramyldipeptide (MDP), or saline on abdominal temperature and voluntary activity in unrestrained rats. Both pyrogens were infused via osmotic pumps at a rate of approximately 2 microg.kg-1.min-1 for 7 d. LPS infusion evoked a 3-d and MDP a 1-d elevation in body temperature. Night-time activity was suppressed on days 1 and 2 during LPS infusion and on day 1 of MDP infusion. Body mass was significantly decreased on infusion day 4 in rats receiving either LPS or MDP; however, the rate of weight gain had been restored by day 8 (1 d after cessation of pyrogen infusion). We further tested the body temperature response of the same experimental animals to a single subcutaneous bolus injection (250 microg/kg) of the same pyrogen that had been infused for 7 d, 2 d after cessation of pyrogen infusion (day 9). The fever response in rats receiving a bolus injection of either LPS or MDP was significantly attenuated in rats that had previously been infused with the same pyrogen. These data suggest that tolerance developed to continuous infusion of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive pyrogens, and that mechanisms of tolerance development set in early during the 7-d infusion period of both pyrogens and persisted for at least 2 d after the cessation of pyrogen infusion. We propose that cytokine intermediates were involved or required in inducing these responses to continuous infusion of both LPS and MDP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".