Assessment of embryonic myocardial cell differentiation using a dual fluorescent reporter system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have identified the existence of undifferentiated myocardial cells during early embryonic as well as post-natal stages of heart development. While primitive cells present in the precardiac mesoderm can differentiate into multiple cell types of the cardiovascular system, the developmental potential of undifferentiated cells identified in the ventricular myocardium after chamber formation is not well characterized. A deeper understanding of mechanisms regulating myocardial cell differentiation will provide further insights into the normal and pathological aspects of heart development. Here, we showed that Nkx2.5 positive and sarcomeric myosin negative cells were predominantly localized in the right ventricular myocardium of CD1 mice at E11.5 stage. We confirmed that myocardial regions negative for saromeric myosin were also devoid of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF). These observations are consistent with our previous study, which showed that ANF expression is restricted to moderately differentiated and mature myocardial cells in E11.5 myocardium of C3H/FeJ mice. Further, we found that the receptor c-Kit, a marker for early embryonic myocardial progenitor cells, is not expressed in the undifferentiated cells of the E11.5 myocardium. To monitor the differentiation potential of Nkx2.5(+)/ANF(-) cells in vitro, we developed a novel double fluorescent reporter system. Subsequently, we confirmed that the majority of Nkx2.5(+)/ANF(-) cells expressed mature myocyte markers such as sarcomeric myosin, MLC2V and alpha-cardiac actin after 48 hrs in culture, albeit at lower levels compared to Nkx2.5(+)/ANF(+) or Nkx2.5(-)/ANF(+) cell populations. Our results suggest that fluorescent reporters under the control of lineage-specific promoters can be used to study myocardial cell differentiation in response to various exogenous or pharmacological agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".