MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070079551 · doi:10.1063/1.3565779

Floating bodies in two dimensions without gravity

2011· article· en· W2070079551 on OpenAlexafffund
Todd Murray Kemp, David Siegel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsRegular polygonEllipseStability (learning theory)Polygon (computer graphics)Convex polygonClassical mechanicsEquilibrium pointGravitationGeometryMathematical analysisMechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study the stability of equilibrium configurations for two-dimensional smooth convex bodies in the absence of gravity, focusing on one example in particular, the ellipse. We also begin to consider the floating configurations of bodies which are not strictly convex; that is, bodies that have one or more linear sides. We will show that a body cannot float in a stable equilibrium with the fluid interface intersecting the interior of a straight side in a single point, and then using this result we will proceed to study the stability of convex bodies comprised of only straight sides consequently deriving a necessary and sufficient condition for stable equilibrium of polygonal bodies. We illustrate our findings using the square as an example. Finally, we prove several results concerning the number of stable and unstable configurations for an n-sided regular polygon (n≥3) including a result guaranteeing the existence of a stable global energy minimum provided the contact angle γ is not 0 or π.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207