MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070081474 · doi:10.1081/qen-120018044

Quality Improvement Strategy in the Electricity Supply Industry

2003· article· en· W2070081474 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. S. Anastasiou

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConnaught FundDivision of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Patras
KeywordsTaguchi methodsQuality (philosophy)Statistical process controlMains electricityQuality managementTotal quality managementElectricityReliability engineeringProcess capabilityEngineeringProcess (computing)Process capability indexManufacturing engineeringVoltageOperations managementComputer scienceWork in processManagement systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel strategy of total quality management (TQM) in the electricity supply industry (ESI) in order to achieve quality improvement. Statistical process control tools, such as control charts, cumulative sum charts, correlation coefficients, and scatter diagrams are introduced to analyze the stability and capability of attributes and variables data affecting the quality of real power and reactive power supply. Also Taguchi's technique is applied for quality improvement of the ESI process. The designed TQM technique demonstrates the quality state of power process in the Hellenic ESI. More specifically, the quality condition, relationship, and capability of frequency and voltage are examined, before and after the installation of flexible AC transmission systems devices in the northeastern Hellenic system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuality EngineeringSame topicEnergy Efficiency and ManagementFrench-language works237,207