MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070084749 · doi:10.1088/0026-1394/40/5/l02

Alternative representation of degradation corrections to space-based measurements of total solar irradiance

2003· article· en· W2070084749 on OpenAlexaff
A.D.O. Bawagan

Bibliographic record

VenueMetrologia · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrradianceDegradation (telecommunications)Representation (politics)Limit (mathematics)BroadbandPhysicsSpace (punctuation)OpticsComputational physicsMathematicsMathematical analysisComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Degradation corrections to solar irradiance measurements in space along with a postulated 'hyperbolic' fitting formula were recently reported (Fröhlich 2003 Metrologia 40 S60–5). A simpler, alternative formula based on broadband synchrotron exposure experiments on polymeric mixtures is presented. The alternative formula is shown to be similar to the hyperbolic function in the high photon dose limit. These results complement and reinforce the physical validity of the previously reported degradation corrections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetrologiaSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207