MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070094002 · doi:10.1109/tii.2012.2205393

Novel Adaptive Gravitational Search Algorithm for Fuzzy Controlled Servo Systems

2012· article· en· W2070094002 on OpenAlexaff
Radu‐Emil Precup, Radu‐Codruţ David, Emil M. Petriu, Ștefan Preitl, Mircea‐Bogdan Rădac

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sensitivity (control systems)Parametric statisticsServomechanismFuzzy logicFuzzy control systemPosition (finance)Adaptive controlServoAdaptive systemMathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmEngineeringControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Electronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel adaptive Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) for the optimal tuning of fuzzy controlled servo systems characterized by second-order models with an integral component and variable parameters. The objective functions consist of the output sensitivity functions of the sensitivity models defined with respect to the parametric variations of the processes. The proposed adaptive GSA solves the optimization problems resulting in a new generation of Takagi-Sugeno proportional-integral fuzzy controllers (T-S PI-FCs) with a reduced time constant sensitivity. A design method for T-S PI-FCs is then proposed and experimentally validated in the representative case study of the optimal tuning of T-S PI-FCs for the position control system of a servo system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207