MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070096546 · doi:10.1109/mic.2014.22

Toward Gaming as a Service

2014· article· en· W2070096546 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Cai, Min Chen, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceProvisioningService (business)MultimediaWorld Wide WebMobile deviceTelecommunicationsBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaming as a service (GaaS) is a future trend in the game industry. The authors survey existing platforms that provide cloud gaming services and classify them into three architectural frameworks to analyze their pros and cons and identify research directions. They also examine the features of different game genres to determine the impact they have on systematic design for cloud gaming services. Finally, they provide a vision on GaaS provisioning for mobile devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.014
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet ComputingSame topicCloud Computing and Remote Desktop TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207