Structural properties of trans hydrido–hydroxo M(H)(OH)(NH2CMe2CMe2NH2)(PPh3)2 (M = Ru, Os) complexes and their proton exchange behaviour with water in solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the synthesis of Ru(II) and Os(II) trans hydrido-hydroxo complexes by reacting the unsaturated amido complexes MH(NHCMe2CMe2NH2)(PPh3)2 (M = Ru, Os) with stoichiometric amounts of water. Proton exchange is rapid at room temperature between the amine/water/hydroxide moieties which leads to signal averaging of the NMR properties which can be slowed at low temperature in order to see resonances of separate complexes. These compounds can also be cleanly converted back to their starting complexes by dehydration in the presence of 3 Å molecular sieves. X-ray crystal structures of these Ru(II) and Os(II) trans hydrido-hydroxo complexes reveal that the unit cell contains an additional molecule of water trapped in the crystal lattice which hydrogen bonds with a neighbouring hydroxo ligand, forming a water bridged dimer in the solid state. Although there are many cases of oxidative addition of water to transition metal complexes, relatively few cases are well characterized where water addition occurs via metal-ligand cooperation (bifunctional addition) without altering the oxidation state of the metal center.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".