MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070147787 · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/19/7/012

Relationships between τ-functions and Fredholm determinant expressions for gap probabilities in random matrix theory

2006· article· en· W2070147787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLuonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen ToimikuntaAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFredholm determinantMathematicsRandom matrixFredholm theoryMatrix (chemical analysis)Symplectic geometrySymmetry (geometry)Unitary statePure mathematicsFunction (biology)Matrix functionMathematical analysisEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSymmetric matrixFredholm integral equationQuantum mechanicsGeometryIntegral equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gap probabilities at the hard and soft edges of scaled random matrix ensembles with orthogonal symmetry are known in terms of $\tau$-functions. Extending recent work relating to the soft edge, it is shown that these $\tau$-functions, and their generalizations to contain a generating function parameter, can be expressed as Fredholm determinants. These same Fredholm determinants also occur in exact expressions for gap probabilities in scaled random matrix ensembles with unitary and symplectic symmetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it