Correction of Mesially Impacted Lower Second Molar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impaction of the lower second molar is not a common problem, but it is very challenging for both orthodontist and oral surgeon. We report the case of patient who complained of a delay in eruption of both the upper and lower second molars. A panoramic radiograph revealed the presence of all permanent teeth and a severe mesial inclination of the left lower second molars and developing third molars. A removable appliance with an uprighting spring was fixed mouth. After two months, a miniscrew was applied maxillar posterior buccal area. And then, an elastic chain was put between miniscrew and lower second molar. Within a period of 4 months the tooth was completely upright. After 5 months, a panoramic radiograph revealed complete uprighting of the tooth, with bone regeneration. Orthodontic uprighting techniques using miniscrews are more advantageous and offer better long term prognosis than surgical uprighting. The timing of treatment and the biomechanics involved determine the success. doi:10.4021/ jmc272w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".