MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Use of Mixed‐Rare‐Earth Oxide in the Preparation of Reaction‐Bonded Mullite at ≤1300°C

2002· article· en· W2070167161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulliteSinteringEutectic systemMaterials scienceOxideCeramicMixed oxideSiliconPhase (matter)Chemical engineeringMetallurgyMineralogyMicrostructureComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A process for production of near‐net‐shape mullite‐matrix ceramic composites at ≤1300°C has been achieved by reaction‐bonding Al 2 O 3 , silicon, mullite seeds, and eutectics of Al 2 O 3 –SiO 2 –mixed‐rare‐earth oxide. The fusion temperature of the eutectic composition utilized is 1175°C. This liquid phase facilitates silicon oxidation, mullitization, and sintering. Mullite phase develops with low residual Al 2 O 3 when 7.5 wt% mixed‐rare‐earth oxide and 5 wt% mullite seeds are used. The final sinter is >90% of theoretical density, >90% mullite (by quantitative XRD), and suffers 2.2% sintering shrinkage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it