MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070180215 · doi:10.5585/conssaude.v7i2.750

Pós-graduação no Exterior: Caminhos e oportunidades com base na experiência de dois fisioterapeutas

2008· article· pt· W2070180215 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConScientiae Saúde · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muitos colegas nos escrevem perguntando sobre oportunidades e o processo para fazer pós-graduação no exterior. Este artigo apresenta as informações sobre pós-graduação no exterior que acreditamos ser relevantes para os colegas que tem interesse nesta possibilidade. Gostaríamos de esclarecer que as informações contidas neste artigo referem-se apenas às nossas experiências e conhecimento limitado sobre pós-graduação no exterior. Temos certeza que existem muitas outras oportunidades e diferentes procedimentos os quais não conhecemos. Contudo, acreditamos que a leitura deste artigo seja um bom começo para os colegas fisioterapeutas que pensam em fazer pós-graduação no exterior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it