MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physical Properties and Oil Absorption of Whey‐Protein‐Coated Paper

2001· article· en· W2070181320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Properties and Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoatingGloss (optics)Whey protein isolateWhey proteinScanning electron microscopeMaterials scienceComposite materialModulusChemical engineeringChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Whey‐protein‐isolate coating on paper produced a smooth surface, which was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Increasing coating weight decreased the breaking stress and the Young's modulus. However, the maximum breaking strain was not affected by coating weight. Tearing strength was not changed by WPI coating. The coated paper was slightly darkened with a small reduction of L value, but the a and b values were not changed significantly. WPI coating made the coated paper slightly shiny with increased gloss. Thus, with the exception of about 12% reduction in breaking stress for 10 g/m 2 coated paper, WPI coating did not change the mechanical and optical properties of the paper markedly. WPI coating significantly reduced the rate of oil contact angle decrease on paper associated with oil absorption by paper. Therefore, WPI coating improves packaging material performance of paper by increasing oil resistance without significant change of optical and mechanical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it