MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070182139 · doi:10.1002/dev.10062

An exploratory study of fetal behavior at 33 and 36 weeks gestational age in hypertensive women

2002· article· en· W2070182139 on OpenAlexaff
J. V. Warner, Sylvia M. J. Hains, Barbara S. Kisilevsky

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Psychobiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestational ageFetusExploratory researchObstetricsPsychologyGestationMedicineDevelopmental psychologyPregnancyBiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between maternal blood pressure (BP) and fetal behaviors as well as differential spontaneous and vibroacoustic elicited fetal behaviors were examined in hypertensive (n = 21) compared to normotensive (n = 22) women at 33 and 36 weeks gestational age (GA). Maternal BP was negatively related to GA at birth and birth weight. On average, fetuses of hypertensive women were born 2 weeks earlier (38 weeks GA) and 340 g lighter. Maternal systolic BP was negatively related to the number of spontaneous body movements observed on ultrasound scan over 20 min and the magnitude of the fetal heart rate (FHR) acceleration elicited by a vibroacoustic stimulus. At 36 weeks GA, vibroacoustic stimulation elicited differential responding with fetuses in the hypertensive compared to the normotensive group having fewer body movements, a lower magnitude of FHR acceleration, and a lack of cardiac-body movement coupled responses. These findings suggest a relationship between maternal BP and fetal behaviors and differential functional development of sensory-motor response systems which need to be characterized in the subgroups of hypertensive disorders observed during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental PsychobiologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207