MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MECHANISMS OF FIRE SUPPRESSION BY HALONS AND HALON REPLACEMENTS: A REVIEW

2003· review· en· W2070242051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. M. Faeth, C. H. Kim, Oh Chae Kwon

Bibliographic record

VenueClean Air · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminar flowOzoneDiffusion flamePremixed flameChemistryFlame structureLaminar flame speedHydrogenDiffusionCombustionEnvironmental scienceMechanicsThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In spite of their effectiveness as flame suppressants, the manufacture of Halons was stopped in 1994 due to their large stratospheric ozone depletion capabilities, in order to comply with the Montreal Protocol. The resulting need for alternative flame suppressants has prompted extensive efforts to better understand flame suppression mechanisms and to develop environmentally acceptable Halon replacements. These efforts are reviewed in the present article, limited to flames involving either hydrogen or hydrocarbon fuels reacting with oxygen due to their relative tractability for detailed numerical simulations. The article begins with consideration of ozone chemistry in the stratosphere in order to highlight the transport and chemical reaction properties of flame suppressants that are responsible for ozone depletion. Recent experimental and computational studies of laminar premixed hydrogen-fueled flames are then considered in order to establish capabilities to predict the fundamental properties of these flames, e.g., their unstretched laminar burning velocities and their flame response to stretch as characterized by Markstein numbers. These results are then extended to consider effects of flame suppressants on the properties of laminar premixed hydrogen-fueled flames. The flame suppressant results show that they mainly function by reducing the concentrations of chain-carrying radicals (H and OH among others) in the reaction zone of flames with corresponding reduced reaction rates causing reduced laminar burning velocities and enhanced effects of extinction. An interesting corollary of this effect, however, is that reduced radical concentrations in the reaction zone also promotes preferential-diffusion/stretch instabilities that enhance flame reaction rates and tend to resist the action of flame suppressants. The new understanding of effects of flame suppressants on radical concentrations in flames is then exploited to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of flame suppression for both chemically-active and chemically-passive flame suppressants in both premixed and nonpremixed flames. These considerations help to identify the potential of various substances to act as effective flame suppressants but with negligible stratospheric ozone depletion potentials. Among these, water mist exhibits flame suppression capabilities potentially comparable to Halon 1301 but with little potential impact on the environment, including ozone depletion; therefore, additional study and development of methods of flame suppression by water mist clearly are merited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClean AirSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207