MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070290895 · doi:10.5589/q14-006

Airfoil performance studies with a trailing edge jet flap

2014· article· en· W2070290895 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ibraheem AlQadi, M. Khalid, Salah Hafez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian aeronautics and space journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirfoilTrailing edgeWingChord (peer-to-peer)Lift coefficientLeading edgeAerodynamicsLift (data mining)Aerospace engineeringJet (fluid)Angle of attackEngineeringComputer scienceMechanicsStructural engineeringPhysicsTurbulenceReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the concept of simple blowing directly from the trailing edge of the wing of an aircraft to provide increased lift, especially during the take-off and landing maneuvers. Although a noticeable increment in coefficient of lift has been obtained to replace or even augment the effect of classic flaps, its application as a means to exert immediate and instantaneous control on stability and control would be an added benefit. Indeed, if such a concept could truly be optimized to replace the physical presence of traditional flaps in an aircraft, the benefits in weight savings and comparative simplicity in design and operational adoptability would be enormous. The jet blowing has been applied at the trailing edge of an airfoil and a 3-D wing at a variety of jet-ejection vector angles with respect to the chord line; a noticeable increase in lift has been recorded using both configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian aeronautics and space journalSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207