Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé À partir d'une brève comparaison entre Bonheur d'occasion de Gabrielle Roy et ¡es Chroniques du Plateau Mont-Royal de Michel Tremblay, cet article veut questionner la 'masculinité" du réalisme. Un premier moment de la démarche consiste à mettre en lumière la grande solidarité des textes de Tremblay avec une • culture au féminin" telle qu'esquissée par certaines critiques. Le moment second tend surtout à montrer que le réalisme masculin est une notion toute relative, en dégageant les aspects communs entre les oeuvres d'un écrivain et d'une écrivaine. Le troisième moment vise finalement à saisir la différence entre les démarches scripturales d'ensemble des deux auteurs, afin de souligner que d'un certain point de vue, Michel Tremblay 'dépasse- l'opposition écrit réaliste/écrit intimiste, opposition marquée dans l'oeuvre de Gabrielle Roy, signalant ainsi les problèmes que pose le rattachement a-priori des genres biologiques et des genres littéraires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".