MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070316472 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.467

Dust Suppression of Phosphate Rock: Storage, Conveyance and Shipping

2012· article· en· W2070316472 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsIPAC Chemicals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePollutionDust controlWaste managementPhosphateMining engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the processing of phosphate ores one is continually faced with the potential of dust generation. Without proper treatment and precautions, dust generation can cause health (air quality) issues, pollution/contamination issues, and fire and explosion hazards. A series of dust control additives were evaluated for their efficacy on phosphate ores using the following criteria: • Conveyance and transloading/shipping simulation: • Storage simulation: • Wetting ability: • Persistence This paper will discuss the results of the above testing, and also provide insight on how to use these laboratory results to provide efficient, effective dust control in real-world applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it