MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070321403 · doi:10.1089/jpm.2005.8.751

Parental Experiences of Adult Child Death from Cancer

2005· article· en· W2070321403 on OpenAlexafffund
Mervyn Dean, Susan McClement, John Bond, Paul Daeninck, Fred R.T. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Palliative Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hospice Palliative Care AssociationUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare ManitobaGovernment of Newfoundland and Labrador
FundersResearch Manitoba
KeywordsMedicineSpouseAutonomyInterviewContent analysisDevelopmental psychologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although parents experience the death of adult children diagnosed with cancer, most of the literature on adult child death has examined the issues of violent death or suicide. Where death from cancer has been studied, the focus has been mainly on psychological outcomes. Little is known about parents' experiences with this phenomenon. OBJECTIVE: To understand parents' experience of having an adult child die from cancer. DESIGN: Descriptive-exploratory study utilizing semistructured interviews with parents of 10 adult children who had died of cancer. SETTING: Parents who had lost a child to cancer were interviewed in their own home or in the interviewer's office. ANALYSIS: Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Latent content analysis and constant comparison techniques were used to develop coding labels, which were then classified into categories and subcategories. RESULTS: Parents experienced a tension between their strong desire to "parent" their child, and their recognition that their child was an autonomous adult, sometimes with a spouse and family who took precedence over them. Parents of a dying child felt helpless, and sometimes were excluded/unacknowledged by health care professionals. To cope, they reconfigured their parent role using various strategies. After the death of their child further reconfiguring takes place, including preserving memories of the child, and talking about him/her. Continuing family and social relationships influence this stage. CONCLUSION: The conflict of wishing to "parent" a dying adult child while recognizing the child's autonomy creates uncertainty for parents at an already stressful time. Facilitating parent-child communication during the illness is important. After the death of the adult child parents may continue to face difficulty with their perceived role in society (parent and/or bereaved person), and sometimes within their family. Health care professionals should make greater efforts to include the parents of the dying adult in the circle of care. The bereavement experience of these parents is intense and long-lasting. Further research is needed regarding the ways in which health care providers can best assist parents to successfully integrate this profound loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Palliative MedicineSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207